The efficiency is not high

A petrochemical company has been listed in the "Top 100 Chinese Petroleum and Chemical Industry Companies in 2005" released by the relevant departments recently, but it is also listed in the "Top 100 Enterprises with Comprehensive Benefits in Petroleum and Chemical Industry". In fact, as long as you compare the two lists, you will find that the situation like this company is not individual. This phenomenon should lead to the thinking of all companies: the efficiency is not high and what is "strong"?

For some time, some companies blindly pursued enterprise scale and sales revenue. It seems that only if the company is large in size, only sales income is high enough to have “sect”. They are keen on the "top 100" and "top ten" and are keen on "the newspaper often has a name, video often has a shadow." However, once the actual inventory of economic benefits, how many profits and taxes the country has turned in, how much net profit it generates each year, how the income of the employees, and so on, the business leaders are somewhat "sorry". To put it bluntly, these "giant" companies are the "dwarfs" of benefits. This kind of business scale and economic efficiency is not proportional to the situation, in our country's enterprises can be said to be everywhere, in the chemical industry, the number of ups and downs naturally is not a minority. However, the pattern of “no more than efficiency” than the obvious pattern of planned economic printing is still quite representative in the minds of some entrepreneurs and some corporate executives.

Businesses regardless of size, pursue a common goal: maximize economic efficiency. Under the conditions of a market economy, the purpose of running a business is to use the least resources to produce the products that the market needs in order to obtain the maximum economic benefits. If the economic benefits are good and the products are popular, the bigger the company, the better. Only large, but only strong, can make more contributions to the country. However, if blindly seeking large projects, blindly investing in projects, short-term loans, long-term losses, and long-term losses, such companies are more dangerous and dangerous. Many once-honored “big companies” are not uncommon examples. On the contrary, although some enterprises are small, their names are not on the “top 100” list, and their positions are not on the rostrum. However, they are proficient in management, are more competitive, have good economic returns, and have developed year by year, making contributions to the country. It is not smaller than some so-called "big companies." Compared with big companies that look big and actually have little benefit, such enterprises are truly "strong" enterprises.

QGS

QGS Series Standard Cylinder

Wuxi ASK Pneumatic Machinery Co.,Ltd , https://www.askpneumtic.com